Are you really comparing what Zimbabwe did to Switzerland being able to defend a particular exchange rate? That seems to be a complete misunderstanding of everything involved here.
Printing of money is unprecedented
CBs balance sheets growing
ZIRP
Cos the main players are TBTF
Primary dealers can leverage up to 100:1 illegally using customer deposits
Rehypthecation
Fudging of economic numbers
HFTs - flash orders and other nefarious activities allowed by exchanges
Ecb changing retroactively greek bond contracts
Unelected leaders running Eu countries in supposed longstanding democracies
Falsifying sub prime mortagage apps
Illegal transfer of bad assets to off balance sheet - corporate and sovereign
There's prob dozens other more informed ppl can add.
Interesting interview:
Chris Martenson Interviews Charles Biderman: The Problem With Rigged Markets | ZeroHedge
Fire away with yours......
Well, this isn't really true... Weakening one's ccy (smth the SNB is attempting to do) is fundamentally different from maintaining its strength (which is what the BoE was trying to do when Soros did his infamous trade). Most obvious case in point is China, which has been successfully "fighting the mkt" for well-nigh 20 years now. There's no signs of them stopping any time soon, either, and certainly no sign of the market "winning", however you define that.I'm no fan of old Georgie Sore-ar$e, but he did remind us of one thing - nobody can fight the market. It always wins in the end. It's a simple matter of human nature. Sore-ar$e knew this.
Thanks Sore-ar$e!
Well, this isn't really true... Weakening one's ccy (smth the SNB is attempting to do) is fundamentally different from maintaining its strength (which is what the BoE was trying to do when Soros did his infamous trade). Most obvious case in point is China, which has been successfully "fighting the mkt" for well-nigh 20 years now. There's no signs of them stopping any time soon, either, and certainly no sign of the market "winning", however you define that.
This discussion occurs in every thread New Trader participates in
True, but, obviously, we're now beyond any sort of a realistic trading time horizon for a punt like this. If you have to wait 20 years for your trade to work, wearing all sorts of volatility in the meantime (i.e. SNB moving the peg to 1.30 or smth), I humbly suggest that it's a sh1t trade. This is in stark contrast to the Soros trade, the main beauty of which was great timing, rather than the fundamental economic rationale.Hi MG,
I made the point mainly because I wanted to call Soros "Sore-ar$e", and one doesn't often get the chance to do that as often as one would like.
I assumed that we were talking about the free(ish) countries, but of course you are right about China. Even accepting that this is a special case, I did say "in the end" - 20 years is nothing really, they can keep it going longer than that.
There has been some interesting discussions and differing points of view expressed since I posted my initial post. I guess that is what makes a market: some people have different views on where a currency pair is going and the speed at which it may get there.
My trade (I have sold at 1.2025) is a long term trade.
My trade is based on the Eur/Chf falling to almost parity (1.0064) in August 2011. The SNB threw a large pile of money at the Euro in Sept which caused the market to move immediately and strongly up above the 1.20 level, where it has remained.
But, on Thursday of last week, the SNB threw ANOTHER €1billion (£825m) at the market (to weaken the Swissie by buying Euros) and yet the Eur/Chf market barely moved. :-0 :-0
Clearly, the Money markets/hedge funds were clearly prepared to sell as many of their Euros to the SNB as the SNB was prepared to buy, because the Eur/Chf simply did NOT go up.
And, if given the opportunity of betting whether a market will defeat a Central Bank over a set currency level, I will always back the market to win in the end. (And I think the end is not far away in this case. The SNB will not keep buying Euros that are dropping in value)
I have thrown the trade suggestion out there as a conversation starter, because I thought it was an interesting trade opportunity. I have personally taken the trade and will watch it work itself out. Hopefully, we may see it fall back to where it was before the SNB intervention in September at near parity. That will give me 2000 pips per trade lot.
PS I trade short term , long term and anything in between. This is only one of my trades.
You're aware, I presume, that this is a negative carry trade? So selling and then holding actually costs you money? That's not a problem, per se, it's just that you need to be mindful of that.As I said above, I trade short term , long term and anything in between. This is only one of my trades.
This is one of my longer term trades. It is a Sell and then hold trade.
I am sure that no-one would be interested in any of my other trades.
I am sure that no-one would be interested in any of my other trades.
You're aware, I presume, that this is a negative carry trade? So selling and then holding actually costs you money? That's not a problem, per se, it's just that you need to be mindful of that.
Whoa, why so sensitive? I didn't mean to insult or anything...Thank you Martinghoul for your Introduction to Trading lesson.
I am a professional trader that has been trading for over 12 years. It is my sole source of income. And I live very well.
True, but, obviously, we're now beyond any sort of a realistic trading time horizon for a punt like this. If you have to wait 20 years for your trade to work, wearing all sorts of volatility in the meantime (i.e. SNB moving the peg to 1.30 or smth), I humbly suggest that it's a sh1t trade.
This is in stark contrast to the Soros trade, the main beauty of which was great timing, rather than the fundamental economic rationale.