fibonelli
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,338
- Likes
- 288
Its amazing how many stupid questions the news readers ask when interviewing 'experts'. Makes me switch over everytime. This is so f***ed up, you have to wonder who is profiting from this, and where will it end. Are we going to see a New Financial Order?
BBC yesterday - "we're not out of the woods though just yet are we?"
referring to record one day rise in FTSE100.
At no stage during yesterdays report did they mention that the rise was only due to the ban on short selling. They think public is stupid, and will forget what they were told yesterday, if they don't mention it today.
They think public is stupid, and will forget what they were told yesterday, if they don't mention it today
Interesting stuff. I read a book earlier on this year called, "Maxed Out". It's about debt in America, with some references to UK debt. It's all done deliberately, to tie people in to the system. Take Mrs T (Thatcher), on one hand she brutalised and starved the miners and on the otherhand gave people the right to buy thier council homes. '...Oh i can buy my house...', very nice of Mrs T, but it ties people into the system, a mortgage is debt, and debt works as a controlling and money making system for the hiararchy. I think the governments and banks have let people hang themselves, financially speaking.
That's true and shows how irresponsible the politicians and authorities have been. Government's first duty is to protect its citizens - they have failed miserably. But on the other hand wiser counsels have been pointing the errors out for some time and still the punters vote them back in.I think the governments and banks have let people hang themselves, financially speaking
Interesting points ......
Many of the people who've over-mortgaged have done it for greed.
That's it, banks dangle the carrot, and not just in the context of mortgages. We have credit cards, loans, car finance, store cards, catalogues etc. Nobody is saving, because nobody has to save, they can have it now.....but at a price, interest. So the banks have done away with saving in effect because they've learnt that savings actually work against them, debt works for them most of the time on a consumer level, they don't have to pay interest, they get paid the interest on what would or should have been savings for whatever the consumer would have been saving for. And to make it even easier to track they offer consolidation packages to bundle the debt and offer a little more on top.....was the plan flawed?
Are people who can't afford thier debt a problem? Are these types pretty much the same problem as criminals, benefit scroungers, illegal immigrants?
"Greed is good", just doesn't seem to have the same meaning these days.
Any thoughts?
I think the governments and banks have let people hang themselves, financially speaking
Once you have some cash behind you & a good credit rating etc. they're no longer interested.
Cramer: Black Monday Could Have Been "Financial Terrorism"
CNBC host compares crash to pre-9/11 short-selling of airline stocks as SEC enforces ban to fight "market manipulation"
The mass media love a scape goat.
With HBOS it was some random city trader who apparently made £2 million short selling HBOS. His face was plastered over the front pages.
I dont even know who jim Cramer is tbh.
But i am certainly open to the theory that financial terrorism or staged market falls/rises can/do occur. If you consider that govt is by far the biggest player in the markets, it stands to reason.
That's a good point, JT. How many times have you heard about people with immaculate credit ratings being refused credit. Banks want(ed) someone who was stereotypically going to need more debt.
Story on radio talk program had this lady who wanted to borrow some money for the first time and turned down.
The system had no record of her borrowing money so they deemed her a bad risk. How crazy is that.