trendie
Legendary member
- Messages
- 6,875
- Likes
- 1,433
What proportion of your trading is "lost" to transaction costs?
For example, if you are SBing, and the spread is 3 pips, then a 100 pip "profit" is actually 100 pips profit, and a cost of 3 pips.
This may not appear too much, but day-traders it might be a 30 pip profit, but the market had to move 33 pips for you to collect 30 pips. In which case you're paying 10% of the move as transaction charges.
For every trade completed, if you added 3 pips costs, how many pips would that be monthly/annually?
Similarly, if your trading spot, you have round-trip costs, etc.
Similarly, you could potentially have a successful strat, but the costs result in you being underwater.
If you treat your trading as a business, can you quantify the overheads?
Have you done this?
Would proportion of costs to trading would cause you to rethink your time-frame, and look at longer-TFs?
Or do you just accept the charges as a function of your trading?
For example, if you are SBing, and the spread is 3 pips, then a 100 pip "profit" is actually 100 pips profit, and a cost of 3 pips.
This may not appear too much, but day-traders it might be a 30 pip profit, but the market had to move 33 pips for you to collect 30 pips. In which case you're paying 10% of the move as transaction charges.
For every trade completed, if you added 3 pips costs, how many pips would that be monthly/annually?
Similarly, if your trading spot, you have round-trip costs, etc.
Similarly, you could potentially have a successful strat, but the costs result in you being underwater.
If you treat your trading as a business, can you quantify the overheads?
Have you done this?
Would proportion of costs to trading would cause you to rethink your time-frame, and look at longer-TFs?
Or do you just accept the charges as a function of your trading?