SpearPointTrader
Junior member
- Messages
- 16
- Likes
- 1
Hey guys!
I was perusing the forums today, and I ran across a number of threads where comments were made about having a target where the trade should end, before you even enter it. I know it's fairly common to do this. My question is "Why"?
In order to do that, would one not need to be clairvoyant? How can you possibly know how far a move will go? Would it not be better to develop a system where you have a set up, where you enter when the set up appears, and exit when it dissolves, at whatever the price is when that happens?
If you do this, you are more likely to enter with the move, and get out before it turns.
A good example of this is a bollinger band squeeze. You would enter when the squeeze confirms direction. Then, as long as the bands are getting wider, the set up is in play. As soon as they stop getting wider, the set up is dissolving.
Now, it may dissolve right away, or you may have a substantial move before it dissolves. This gives you a method that adjusts with the market conditions, rather than a hard rigid exit that may, or may not be in sink with the changing conditions of the markets.
What do you guys think?
THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING COMMODITIES CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL.
THE HIGH DEGREE OF LEVERAGE THAT IS OFTEN ATTAINABLE IN COMMODITY TRADING CAN WORK FOR YOU, AS WELL AS AGAINST YOU.
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS
I was perusing the forums today, and I ran across a number of threads where comments were made about having a target where the trade should end, before you even enter it. I know it's fairly common to do this. My question is "Why"?
In order to do that, would one not need to be clairvoyant? How can you possibly know how far a move will go? Would it not be better to develop a system where you have a set up, where you enter when the set up appears, and exit when it dissolves, at whatever the price is when that happens?
If you do this, you are more likely to enter with the move, and get out before it turns.
A good example of this is a bollinger band squeeze. You would enter when the squeeze confirms direction. Then, as long as the bands are getting wider, the set up is in play. As soon as they stop getting wider, the set up is dissolving.
Now, it may dissolve right away, or you may have a substantial move before it dissolves. This gives you a method that adjusts with the market conditions, rather than a hard rigid exit that may, or may not be in sink with the changing conditions of the markets.
What do you guys think?
THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING COMMODITIES CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL.
THE HIGH DEGREE OF LEVERAGE THAT IS OFTEN ATTAINABLE IN COMMODITY TRADING CAN WORK FOR YOU, AS WELL AS AGAINST YOU.
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS
Last edited: