JTrader
Guest
- Messages
- 5,741
- Likes
- 507
jtrader -
http://quote.fxtrek.com/misc/fxcm.asp - FXCM Forex FX Trek I charts which use S&P Comstock data as an indicative price source. S&P Comstock provides a market average of prices for over 20 of the largest banks in the world. Have been told that the differences between FXCM pricing and S&P Comstock pricing is negligible.
http://quote2.fxtrek.com/misc/fxcm2.asp - Identical to FXtrek I -- except it utilizes quotes from the FXCM Forex dealing desk. These java-based charts offer present and historical quotes from FXCM's dealing desk.
Hi
I have witnessed the SPcomstock data charts moving in 2-3 and even 4 pip steps - while the FXCM data intellicharts do not follow suit - and this is during non-volatile periods of the day (15:00 GMT). The SP Comstock datafeed does strike me as being a bit busier and less smooth in its movements...........Even if the FXCM (or other retail broker) charts/datafeed were to jump around in 2-3 and even 4 pip steps - at least you'd know these were tradeable prices.
Elsewhere on the discussion boards I gathered the opinion that the SPComstock datafeed is better/less jumpy than the GTIS datafeed (esignal charts) - so the GTIS feed must be jumpy.
.........................
I'd like to gage other retail forex traders opinions on this matter. When trading retail forex on an intraday basis - in order to trade accurately and successfully - do you consider it necessary to trade with a chart of the datafeed of your retail broker, or do you consider it an acceptable practice to trade from charts from a neutral or composite datafeed such as SPComstock, GTIS, Reuters or EBS?
Many thanks
jtrader.
Last edited: