Specific Formation definitions?!?

cyborgSHK

Newbie
Messages
1
Likes
0
So I'm trying to develop a business plan for technical trading, and in order to do so, I want to forward test how certain technical patterns hold up (and possibly back test eventually if I ever learn how to do that effectively)

But, my main point that I am trying to at here is this: in order to really test, say, a double top's effectiveness, you have to have a specific definition of what a double top *is*. I know the classic definition, of course, but I'm really hung up on the part where most people say "the two tops are *about* the same price".

Does anyone use any specific numbers, and if so, how did you determine those? I'm personally trading US Treasuries, Eurex Bunds, Stoxx and Dax using 60 min charts. Any info on those specific markets is great, but any info on any maket is good too, so I can pick some brains about methodology.

The other thing I'm having trouble is with Trend Lines. The classic technical idea is "the more times it's tested, the better," but I don't have a definition of "test."

Thanks in advance for any insights.

CyborgSHK
 
Before you spend a great deal of time on this, see Bulkowski's work. He's explored this extensively.

Db
 
dbphoenix said:
Before you spend a great deal of time on this, see Bulkowski's work. He's explored this extensively.

Db

Does he present the formula he is using to test the double top in his book?

I mean, a double top may have in its formation 10 bars or 1000 bars. What does Bulkowski defines as a double top?

Alex
 
Top