natureboy
Established member
- Messages
- 770
- Likes
- 2
Ok, so to make money, you have to have the risk, reward, and accuracy variables of the equity curve equation within certain parameters. for instance you can have a winning strategy with only 30% accuracy or win rate as long as your reward pay outs are large enough relative to the risk you take on.
i prefer high probability methods, meaning 60% or greater accuracy.
so what really works? statistically, how many around here have sampled 100 trades? 1,000 trades? .. of various methods?
from what i've heard, the Andrew Cardwell type divergence, or hidden divergence, is 6/10 over large sample. certain patterns are also high probability.
i've been looking at combining P&F patterns with the hidden divergence as a possible system. coding that right now actually..
walter bressert has cycle/oscillator combinations, although i have yet to experiment with that...
what do folks around here use? some may feel this is a state secret. i sort of look at it that way, in terms of people who do not want to put any effort into getting something. but on the flipside, knowing that something works for others is not the real work, is it? its part of the picture..
EXITS are tricky, and are what determine our reward to risk on a trade. Do people scale out? Set objectives? Use a parabolic sar or chandelier? I'm just looking for something i have not heard of yet, or some good chatter, either way
i prefer high probability methods, meaning 60% or greater accuracy.
so what really works? statistically, how many around here have sampled 100 trades? 1,000 trades? .. of various methods?
from what i've heard, the Andrew Cardwell type divergence, or hidden divergence, is 6/10 over large sample. certain patterns are also high probability.
i've been looking at combining P&F patterns with the hidden divergence as a possible system. coding that right now actually..
walter bressert has cycle/oscillator combinations, although i have yet to experiment with that...
what do folks around here use? some may feel this is a state secret. i sort of look at it that way, in terms of people who do not want to put any effort into getting something. but on the flipside, knowing that something works for others is not the real work, is it? its part of the picture..
EXITS are tricky, and are what determine our reward to risk on a trade. Do people scale out? Set objectives? Use a parabolic sar or chandelier? I'm just looking for something i have not heard of yet, or some good chatter, either way