I have a huge decision to make over the weekend and I wonder what other traders views are re: the costs incurred in guaranteeing stop losses.
I opened a CFD account with IG Markets three weeks ago and I am swing trading FTSE 250 stocks with a good degree of success. I have no complaints vis-a-vis IG and I've enjoyed trading with them. My positions can run anywhere between a few hours and a few days. A couple of my current positions have been on for over a week.
However, when I looked at my account this morning I saw that I had paid £451.87 in costs of which £300 is guaranteed stop loss premiums; the rest is in commissions, £10 each time I hit the button to open or close. No losing trades thus far, and using only a small portion of my capital available by way of deposit on each trade (usually anywhere between 5 and 10%) I have made just over £2,000 in three weeks. I could have made £2,300 had it not been for the guaranteed stop premiums (they're insurance premiums.) But, I'm assessing this morning whether I really need guaranteed stop losses when I am able to check my positions throughout the day. I guess the only reason that I sign up for these hungry beasts is so that I don't worry too much about overnight gaps. Gaps, such as they've been - and there tend to be gaps up or down when the market opens - have not been sufficient to trigger any of these stops. So, I wonder if I'm wasting money by opting for guaranteed stops on FTSE 250 stocks which have reasonable liquidity.
I suppose the other thing worth investigating is enlarging the positions and reducing the number of trades to control commissions and make each trade more cost effective.
I'd be interested in the views of other traders. Thanks
I opened a CFD account with IG Markets three weeks ago and I am swing trading FTSE 250 stocks with a good degree of success. I have no complaints vis-a-vis IG and I've enjoyed trading with them. My positions can run anywhere between a few hours and a few days. A couple of my current positions have been on for over a week.
However, when I looked at my account this morning I saw that I had paid £451.87 in costs of which £300 is guaranteed stop loss premiums; the rest is in commissions, £10 each time I hit the button to open or close. No losing trades thus far, and using only a small portion of my capital available by way of deposit on each trade (usually anywhere between 5 and 10%) I have made just over £2,000 in three weeks. I could have made £2,300 had it not been for the guaranteed stop premiums (they're insurance premiums.) But, I'm assessing this morning whether I really need guaranteed stop losses when I am able to check my positions throughout the day. I guess the only reason that I sign up for these hungry beasts is so that I don't worry too much about overnight gaps. Gaps, such as they've been - and there tend to be gaps up or down when the market opens - have not been sufficient to trigger any of these stops. So, I wonder if I'm wasting money by opting for guaranteed stops on FTSE 250 stocks which have reasonable liquidity.
I suppose the other thing worth investigating is enlarging the positions and reducing the number of trades to control commissions and make each trade more cost effective.
I'd be interested in the views of other traders. Thanks