Signalcalc
Veteren member
- Messages
- 4,670
- Likes
- 1,031
Due to popular demand and because there is no appropriate thread for interesting Geopolitical discussion.
It's all going Pete Tong
It's all going Pete Tong
Good idea SC,
I used to follow international developments very closely but spend less time now as apathy takes over.
Well worth following though especially for trading gold oil and currencies.
Sell the dollar buy the euro 😁
The latest stupid idea is to send a British aircraft carrier to the South China Sea. Probably at the request of US forces.
About as provocative as having Chinese warships in the Channel !!
Somebody ought to mention to Mrs Useless that Britain is no longer the strategic power it once was.
Absolootly right Pat...though imo, constructing military bases on uninhabited atolls in disputed waters a few miles off the coast of just one of the claimants and a thousand or so away from one's own sends a very clear message: Put up or Shut Up.
So which course of action do you favour? Shutting up?..or perhaps just leaving it in the hands of our our American cousins and that beacon of international diplomacy, Donald Trump....meanwhile: Huawei.
Map of the area for context:
View attachment 262151
International claims etc:
File:South China Sea Claims and Boundary Agreements 2012.jpg - Wikimedia Commons
commons.wikimedia.org
It’s a disturbing enough news item, but does the lack of condemnation from international governments tell us any about the geopolitics at play?
Five 'terrorists' beheaded by Saudi Arabia were gay, say confessions
Five 'terrorists' beheaded by Saudi Arabia were gay, say confessions
One of the 37 men beheaded in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday had confessed to having homosexual relationships with four of his co-accused, according to court documents.mol.im
Without principals any group becomes no better than a gang of thieves and murderersSounds like they are demonstrating support to the Sultan of Brunie to me. Saudis can say and do whatever they like coz they can afford to do so. Money trumps principals.
Out of curiousity, how do you perceive the status of the Falkland Islands?
Without principals any group becomes no better than a gang of thieves and murderers
Without principals any group becomes no better than a gang of thieves and murderers
Different. The Falklands are inhabited and the Spratlys not. No doubt the Kelpers keep the flame for the Empire but they're not part of a plan to change the balance of power in Latin America.... and unless I'm much mistaken there's been little Chinese style of tourism installations - examples of which below:
View attachment 262177View attachment 262178View attachment 262179
Mind you, Falkand Islanders are a force to be reckoned with and woe betide anyone who gets in their way:
View attachment 262180
Without principals any group becomes no better than a gang of thieves and murderers
I guess China is a little late for this game of colonising the World. Nevertheless one must try.
Also....
"When Exposing a Crime is Treated as Committing a Crime, You Are Ruled By Criminals."
"When Exposing a Crime is Treated as Committing a Crime, You Are Ruled By Criminals." That about sums it up. Courtesy What? Wake Up! and Lionel's totallyreason.com