2be
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,083
- Likes
- 370
The very name of this worthy forum, Trade2Win, suggests that a winning might be a preferable aim and a desirable outcome of the given traders efforts.
I am aware of the "win - win" scenario, along the lines of Pareto improvement, for example - every body wins if a war is avoided, though some investors in munition production might not gain, or even loose, but majority win and stay alive.
Another very important win-win scenario is furnished by the equality of opportunity.
Unfortunately the equality of opportunity is often confused with equality of outcome.
I firmly agree with the notion that every and all efforts made in promoting equality of opportunity is the best way forward.
Trading is not a win - win scenario, unless of course the losers gain some positive life changing insides which might be considered worthy principles to follow leading to positive improvements in their lives.
Pareto distribution of 80-20 rule very likely applies to retail traders, I would say well over 90% of retail traders are loosers and are hurt by it to various degree, few % break, even, and at best 5% are consistent winners, winners also of various degree measured by amounts, or percentages.
Realistically, it can safely be assumed that an overwhelming majority of retail traders by their own actions have placed themselves firmly in the segment of traders where the common qualifier, taking into account all members of that group, is 100% equality of outcome in status of being a looser, though with the various degrees of lost capital, time and effort.
TBC
I am aware of the "win - win" scenario, along the lines of Pareto improvement, for example - every body wins if a war is avoided, though some investors in munition production might not gain, or even loose, but majority win and stay alive.
Another very important win-win scenario is furnished by the equality of opportunity.
Unfortunately the equality of opportunity is often confused with equality of outcome.
I firmly agree with the notion that every and all efforts made in promoting equality of opportunity is the best way forward.
Trading is not a win - win scenario, unless of course the losers gain some positive life changing insides which might be considered worthy principles to follow leading to positive improvements in their lives.
Pareto distribution of 80-20 rule very likely applies to retail traders, I would say well over 90% of retail traders are loosers and are hurt by it to various degree, few % break, even, and at best 5% are consistent winners, winners also of various degree measured by amounts, or percentages.
Realistically, it can safely be assumed that an overwhelming majority of retail traders by their own actions have placed themselves firmly in the segment of traders where the common qualifier, taking into account all members of that group, is 100% equality of outcome in status of being a looser, though with the various degrees of lost capital, time and effort.
TBC
Last edited: