JumpOff
1
- Messages
- 702
- Likes
- 14
I have a question about the way different traders approach learning how to trade.
I hear people talk about a discretionary or intuitive type of trading, and I wonder, is it similar to learning to play a musical intrument by ear? - by feeling the sound and by imitating the postures and riffs of competent players. There is a open approach that is driven by the players need to experience the music, and an assumption that competence will come. These musicians sound a little sloppy when starting out, but they are quickly playing recognizable tunes that make you tap your foot. Later they can hear a piece of music once, and play it just because it's fun on any of 4 or 5 instruments. Sometimes even after years they can't read music to save their life - don't even know the names of the notes.....
Other people seem to be more into the maths, the probabilities - similar to learning to play 'mary had a little lamb' with only the right hand by reading music? Then using that as a building block to add one little degree of difficulty with each piece of new music the instructor gives them. This seems more driven by the players need for competence, and assumption that the feeling will come. They progress more slowly - their playing is childish and mechanical at the start, but if they stick with it - their steady progress takes them to concert quality within their area of expertise. They've got 30 pieces ready for performance at any given time. Sometimes even after years they can't pick out a simple melody line by ear to save their life - wouldn't know a hot blues lick if it hit them in the face......
Both can result in competent musicians, but they tend to have different choices about what they choose to play, styles and methods, and the reason they choose to play at all.
Are their other styles of trading as well? Maybe you have a different metaphor? I'm sure it's not always either/or. But a bit of mix and match?
JO
I hear people talk about a discretionary or intuitive type of trading, and I wonder, is it similar to learning to play a musical intrument by ear? - by feeling the sound and by imitating the postures and riffs of competent players. There is a open approach that is driven by the players need to experience the music, and an assumption that competence will come. These musicians sound a little sloppy when starting out, but they are quickly playing recognizable tunes that make you tap your foot. Later they can hear a piece of music once, and play it just because it's fun on any of 4 or 5 instruments. Sometimes even after years they can't read music to save their life - don't even know the names of the notes.....
Other people seem to be more into the maths, the probabilities - similar to learning to play 'mary had a little lamb' with only the right hand by reading music? Then using that as a building block to add one little degree of difficulty with each piece of new music the instructor gives them. This seems more driven by the players need for competence, and assumption that the feeling will come. They progress more slowly - their playing is childish and mechanical at the start, but if they stick with it - their steady progress takes them to concert quality within their area of expertise. They've got 30 pieces ready for performance at any given time. Sometimes even after years they can't pick out a simple melody line by ear to save their life - wouldn't know a hot blues lick if it hit them in the face......
Both can result in competent musicians, but they tend to have different choices about what they choose to play, styles and methods, and the reason they choose to play at all.
Are their other styles of trading as well? Maybe you have a different metaphor? I'm sure it's not always either/or. But a bit of mix and match?
JO