karmit said:Hi,
Would appreciate if anyone could point to really good books/ websites for leaning fib analysis.
Please only suggest those that you have read/ follow!!
Cheers,
karmit
chump said:If you absolutely must then I would say it is explained as thoroughly by Robert Fischer as anyone..he's written at least a couple of texts on the subject..I think his latest was an update called New Fibonacci Trader or similar...
karmit said:Put it next to your books on crop circles and spoonbending.
Karmikarmit said:Hi,
Would appreciate if anyone could point to really good books/ websites for leaning fib analysis.
Please only suggest those that you have read/ follow!!
Cheers,
karmit
Charlton said:Karmi
In many ways there is not a lot to learn. It is an extension of traditional support and resistance TA analysis, but with natural rhythms and number series thrown in.
Natural rhythms is something I might explore on my thread about the release of energy in the trading environment on the psychology site.
Charlton
andycan said:depends what you mean by fib
a basic retracements or extension is something any one can do, you dont need books for it.
recognising a relationship in the markets is something very few do for themselves and rather read a book to give them the answer but in reality no book that i know gives you this information
the best approach is to use your point of reference and determine the relationship
whether that involves ABC's structures, 5 waves structures to name but a few
timing, price and time, contractions and expansions of price and times etc
most importantly once you have an understanding of the players and how they work then the measurements are just a formality
yes waves relating to time or price or bothniceguy777 said:You can see how the Elliott Waves work by checking out the Absolute Fibonacci Framework. Basically, the wayes form on the framework which defines the points of resistance.
andycan said:yes waves relating to time or price or both
very handy but that is just one part, not all market, trend by definition,
so waves in the latter situation are redundant, the key is geometric relationships, it is well know that to know the future one must understand the past,
take time as the example, if a market works on the premise of the square and the related cycle is half of the previous cycle (not in sequence it very rarely is) then you can be sure with high certainty that, that particular turning point is not dominant.
now the problem with my comments is to a potential geometer is:-
1/ not all markets are square related, to know you have to look and prove it to yourself.
2/ some markets are geometric others are harmonic, to know this you have to prove it to yourself
3/ some markets are not of the normal geometric variety, i.e fib, root 2 or root 3 again to know you have to prove it to yourself
4/ some markets are prone to have a little of all the above,
but as i have mentioned before in other posts its a matter of perspective, and knowing the players involved in the particular markets you are trading
the complexity is in the eye of the beholderniceguy777 said:Well, it's never seemed quite that complicated to me, and I am not familiar with some of the terms you are using, but if that works for you, that's great!