Here is someone else's analysis of Powerball draws:
https://medium.com/@paulostochaj/how-random-is-the-lottery-really-9727535db415
That p-value is not statistically significant.
So, even if the numbers drawn do not have a perfect even distribution, the patterns in them are likely not predictive.
I get it. Someone asking someone else to prove their performance is a "loser in denial."
https://www.reddit.com/r/FuturesTradingNQ/comments/1ik7fho/comment/mc99n3k/
The original post has "All questions will be answered," and my question is:
If the indicator is so good, why do you feel the need...
It sounds like you are saying you had a limit order but the broker filled it at a value worse than the limit value. If so, you probably have a good chance of getting the problem fixed.
If your order was a market order and you think the price quoted was incorrect, it will be a lot harder to win...
"4% of your starting balance" sounds unambiguously static to me. So, assuming his maximum drawdown was 4265.9068 (could be higher as you point out), the account would have needed a minimum starting equity greater than 4265.9068 / 0.04 == 106,647.67
Assuming this is the prop firm (not 100% sure)
https://paxmarketfunds.com/faq/
So, your "100K" account highest equity was 101,160.0163, 4% of this is 4,046.400652, and your 4,265.9068 drawdown exceeded the maximum allowed value.
See also...