The Leopard
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,877
- Likes
- 1,021
It's also a bit unfair on Jungerns, he was desperate to sign up and get another winning signal service on the go. 
So for the record his latest scheme is selling very profitable signals, Jungerns was all over it.
Unfortunately wallstreet1928 made a few errors and didn't cover his tracks very well. He was posting here as henry_d121, a quick search turned up a few interesting instances of the same user name being used elsewhere.
This screenshots shows some using the name Henry Dankwa with the user name henry_d121.
Unfortunately wallstreet1928 made a few errors and didn't cover his tracks very well. He was posting here as henry_d121, a quick search turned up a few interesting instances of the same user name being used elsewhere.
This screenshots shows some using the name Henry Dankwa with the user name henry_d121.
Attachments
barjon
Legendary member
- Messages
- 10,752
- Likes
- 1,863
Can never damn well win with you lot "how dare you leave a thread like that running" one minute then "how dare you delete the thread" the next.
wackypete2
Legendary member
- Messages
- 10,211
- Likes
- 2,058
You know very well that all you had to do was delete any links or other crap he posted and leave the proof of his dishonesty for everyone to see. Why is that so difficult?
The Leopard
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,877
- Likes
- 1,021
No complaints from me Jon, so I hope that wasn't directed my way.
What PB means I think is that there are two broad types:
1. Random (or apparently random) punter turns up and starts building up his scam). Don't know him from Adam, but the thread is clearly garbage and intended as a hook (500 pips a minute etc). Those are the ones that should probably deleted immediately, or once Hare and the rest of us have had a bit of fun with the chump.
2. Known scammer turns up to have a second (third, fourth, fifth etc) bite at the cherry. He starts his fishing, PB digs up the dirt and links him to previous nics / scams. Valuable info as any google searches etc will link them, so this forms part of a good informal database on the scumbag. As in this case, and these are the ones he (and most of us I think) should be left standing, as they contain valuable evidence-based material.
That's how I see it, anyway. PB, if I'm wrong, please correct me.
isatrader
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,963
- Likes
- 135
He's got another thread under another multinic currently I believe, but I could be wrong: http://www.trade2win.com/boards/uk-indices/154996-swing-trading-ftse-100-a.html
You're spot on. In these circumstances deleting it just lets them off the hook, they'll be back another day under a new name as they know there is no downside to being caught.
Here's a good example of a thread that should not be deleted. OK delete his crap indicators but keep the information up to warn others.
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/indicators/155284-fisher-system.html
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/indicators/155284-fisher-system.html
Soloquan
Established member
- Messages
- 646
- Likes
- 24
barjon
Legendary member
- Messages
- 10,752
- Likes
- 1,863
Yes and when I advanced that argument on the "advertisers" thread it was pooh-poohed. You also said in your reply to my earlier post that I should delete any links etc - what links?
SuddenDeath
Legendary member
- Messages
- 14,063
- Likes
- 143
nice smear job samirs, why is my name on a thread about wallstreet1928's apparent scam?
I have been registered with trade2win for about 10years and your the first person to accuse me of being dishonest.
can you tell me which of my comments you posted is false? or could I have been taken in by his scam?
I was speaking generally, if there are links delete them, if not then don't. Why delete the whole thread and let him away with it again?
barjon
Legendary member
- Messages
- 10,752
- Likes
- 1,863
As I've tried to point out before, peebee, I think you can argue it both ways in terms of what offers the better "protection" for vulnerable members. Where a thread starts off alright (other than the general chorus that all such things are suspect) and the evidence comes along later I'd suggest it is probably better deleting it since new readers may well jump in without reading the whole thread and getting to the evidence.
On the other hand, where a thread starts off with a critical examination of something it's probably better leaving it since new readers will have the evidenced warning in front of them from the start.
DionysusToast
Legendary member
- Messages
- 5,965
- Likes
- 1,501
Have you considered starting up your own forum?
Seems you are very specific on how you think such a forum should be run.
Why not start your own?
P Boil not got time, he grinding axe big every days. Not even got time trading and profits.
No I'd rather hound vendors and thieves here instead, at least until I'm banned again.
wackypete2
Legendary member
- Messages
- 10,211
- Likes
- 2,058
And how would getting banned help your cause? Losing your voice in the forum isn't the way to go IMO.
Peter
Similar threads
