VSATrader said:Hi;
I think that the Darvas method mabe needs it own space, and thanks to JillyB and TraderAli and Baruch, I now understand this method and will be posting my trades and observations here. You are welcome to join me.
Regards VSATrader
VSATrader said:Hi;
I think that the Darvas method mabe needs it own space, and thanks to JillyB and TraderAli and Baruch, I now understand this method and will be posting my trades and observations here. You are welcome to join me.
Regards VSATrader
VSATrader said:Hi folks,
We have our first breakout ! but I'll wait until morning. Sleep well
VSATrader said:Thanks JillyB, I can see that you are a magnet for this method, so that's cool. And you too Baruch..
This has the making of a great thread.
Regards VSATrader
trendie said:this thread has incredible potential.
1: The box rules are absolutely clear, in ALL time-frames.
( as opposed to secret indicators, and special settings )
2: The trades can be easily, and objectively evaluated. ( data-quality permitting )
best of all;
3: Potential trades can be easily flagged in ADVANCE.
Point 3 alone can help newbies dip their toes in the water, and they will be able to see for themselves the trade forming, and have confidence to try, knowing more experienced traders are trading and posting D-Box trades.
Im sure, over a period of time, new nuances can be discerned, especially with so many eyes and minds trading so many markets.
Areas to discuss will be time-frames, and exits.
good luck with it VSATrader, and others.
indexgold said:someone wrote
he was plain lucky in one of his trades that made almost 850000 with maximum leverage..It could have turned to be a BIg loser.. So money management was not something
he cared
Very true.....Be careful, it's not the holy grail
Its true they are very clear.trendie said:this thread has incredible potential.
1: The box rules are absolutely clear, in ALL time-frames.
( as opposed to secret indicators, and special settings )
What is the objective evaluation ? What level of success rate/% of potential profit is captured in comparison with other common Forex trading methodologies ?trendie said:2: The trades can be easily, and objectively evaluated. ( data-quality permitting )
best of all;
Again, along, similar lines to the above questions - how do the prediction of trades compare with other classic techniquestrendie said:3: Potential trades can be easily flagged in ADVANCE.
Experienced traders use a range of methods. What percentage (rough will do) would you say are using D-Box for forex ?trendie said:Point 3 alone can help newbies dip their toes in the water, and they will be able to see for themselves the trade forming, and have confidence to try, knowing more experienced traders are trading and posting D-Box trades.
indexgold said:one must remember Darves used to trade stocks and he liked volume to confirm. there is no volume to watch on the FX markets. further more darves was an end of day trader. when applying his method to day trading you will get a lot of false signal as JillyB pointed out.
Me personally I like buying low and selling high on extremes when trading intraday, with darves this is not the case.
Hi Charlton,Charlton said:Trendie
I would appreciate it if you could elaborate on some points about Darvas. Darvas fans seem to have a tendency to litter their postings with URLs to other sites, so a summary reply to my points/questions would be appreciated rather than further links.
Its true they are very clear.
It seems to me that, in summary, they are a cross between support/resistance lines and congestion patterns. For example on the chart shown in post 5 we could have drawn a classic triangle and breakout.
How would you describe the underlying market action behind the box. Is it superiour, in your opinion, to other classic TA patterns, S/R etc and, if so, why.
What is the objective evaluation ? What level of success rate/% of potential profit is captured in comparison with other common Forex trading methodologies ?
Again, along, similar lines to the above questions - how do the prediction of trades compare with other classic techniques
Experienced traders use a range of methods. What percentage (rough will do) would you say are using D-Box for forex ?
Respectfully, should you not tone down or give the usual "Trading currencies is risky business ......." warning, as you seem to be implying that if newbies use D-Boxes they cannot go wrong. It will put them in the same bracket as experienced traders just by using them. This is how it sounds to me anyway !
Thanks
Charlton
trendie said:Hi Charlton,
This thread should be seen as a project, where a set of rules are posted, and then to see if experience proves or disproves the effectiveness of D-Boxes.
The answers you want with regards to success rates, and prediction rates are unknown, but this thread could act as a study zone, where interested parties can pass on their knowledge, and to see if several people, all adding their bit results in improved performances.
I didnt intend to suggest the answers already exist, or that this method is superior, or not without risks. I am curiously to see where this thread will be in say 6 weeks from now.
( the Live Cable Thread started off with traders trying to prove how clever they were, and getting more pips than others, and eventually matured into exploring different ideas, and sharing strategies, and warning each other of news events, etc. )
hope that helps.