One added rule; books that are published by the likes of Financial Times
I think there are some publishers who would publish any trading books (edit: junks).
FT is in the business of publishing unbiased "facts". And one way of somewhat safeguarding against complacency is the authors' track record - at least the likes of FT will get that part right.
Hi,
I have been reading a lot recently about trading and realised something.
"Author's credibility"
I find it difficult to take this leap of faith and totally believe author's word when a trading technique is described. Some writers have side businesses like website/news letter/etc to promote on the side and it feels apparent that they are mostly unsuccessful/modestly successful traders trying to con the readers.
Whats more annoying is how they neglect to show statistical data that can be easily verified and take readers as m@r@ns who will take their word for it because they have a website called "xxx Research"
I have basically thrown most rubbish books away and started reading books that have stood the test of time. "Reminiscence of stock operator" and "New market wizards" to name a few. One added rule; books that are published by the likes of Financial Times and reviewed and/or foreword written by reputable practitioners.
I am in my early stages of learning but feel I am making strides by picking the right teachers.
Hi secondary,One added rule; books that are published by the likes of Financial Times and reviewed and/or foreword written by reputable practitioners.
Now I'm curious, what was so bad about this book and what is the trading rule that can make you rich? I'm always on the lookout for really bad trading books, they're much more entertaining than the good ones.Hi secondary,
This made me smile as it's a similar principle to one that I apply to films. If the director and lead(s) are people I like - I'll watch it. Combine this with the star rating in the Radio Times (which, over the years, I've found to be pretty good) and I have myself a pretty effective filter. Like you, I tried to apply a similar approach to publishers of trading books, but it doesn't seem to work as well. Take Harriman House as an example. I bought 'The Definitive Guide to Point & Figure Charting' by Jeremy du Plessis which is absolutely top drawer, IMO. Also by HH I have 'Ichimoku Charts - An introduction to Ichimoku Kinko Clouds' by Nicole Elliot which is the second worst trading book in my collection. To this day I can't fathom how HH can be the publisher of both books. The accolade of the all time worst book ever goes to 'The Trading Rule That Can Make You Rich' by Edward D. Dobson, published by Traders Press. I'll certainly think twice before buying another one of their titles. Publishers who strike me as being pretty consistant in terms of quality of their output are McGraw Hill and Wiley.
Just my £0.02p worth of course.
Tim.
I don't know what stage of learning you are at, but one of the most important stages is working out who to trust and what to listen to. If you take the wrong path at this stage then you could put yourself back by years, or never make it at all.
From your post it sounds like you are intelligent and certainly your cynicism will set you in good stead. There are some classics that are total garbage and will set you back, and others that may hold the key for you.
I could recommended you some books, but how do you know that you can trust me?
Thanks for this cuotes, although I'm a tad unclear what the life cycle model of crowd behaviour has to do with picking a book or book publisher which, after all, is the topic of the thread?Dear Timsk, and others:
In 'The Tipping Point: How Little things can make a big difference', Malcolm Gladwell defined the way people react to change by classifying them on a spectrum:
innovators: early adopters: early majority: late majority: laggards
what the life cycle model of crowd behaviour has to do with picking a book or book publisher
Systems, tricks, patterns and 'edges' don't move markets. The only entity that moves any market is volume. Are there any good books about volume?
Spinal tap's?
I agree that systems, tricks, patterns and edges don't move markets, but neither does volume.Systems, tricks, patterns and 'edges' don't move markets. The only entity that moves any market is volume. Are there any good books about volume?