Well I am not vending anything but each to their own -whatever works for the individual trader is good -yes
Neil - If you feel I am trying to sell something in these posts - report the posts.
If you cannot argue your point, consider the merits of silent introspection as apposed to taking sideswipes about things that are not relevant to the discussion.
Where the market has been is relevant. Charts show this very well, although I think volume profiles on charts add a dimension of extra information about who may still be positioned at certain prices and where stops may exist.
Most candlestick analysis is flawed. That's because the markets move organically, not in time spliced increments. Reading so much into OHLC is flawed because a quick change of timeframe tells you a completely different story for the same action in the same market.
We seem to have discussions based on the premise that all things work until proven otherwise. The argument "to each his own" basically means we should forgo discussions and not back up our points.
Why WOULD pin bars on a certain timeframe chart be any better an indicator of a reversal than another reversal that didn't have OHLC aligned such that a tail was formed? Same thing happened at the end of the day....
Here is a current 4 hour chart of Crude Jan 15 on NYMEX.
Then we change the timeframe and the pin bar disappears
Then we do the same again and the bottom reversal suddenly turns into a pin bar
And this was the first chart I looked at.
How can the open/close/high/low of a candle really tell you anything when a simple change in timeframe changes the picture entirely? Of course, it doesn't
What the chart does tell you - where it's been & where the major turns were.
You can make a science of it if you want but to be honest but looking at a chart from my perspective is a hell of a lot simpler.
And the funny thing is - you bring the whole "vendor" thing into the argument when this candlestick thing is one of the greatest pieces of retail trading vendor BS in existence.